FAAA Calls for ASIC Investigation Overhaul: A Demand for Transparency and Accountability
FAAA Calls for ASIC Investigation Overhaul: A Demand for Transparency and Accountability
2
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
In a recent submission to the Treasury, the Financial Advice Association Australia (FAAA) has pressed for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to adopt a more comprehensive approach when investigating financial service complaints.
The FAAA has underscored the need for ASIC to expand its investigation purview beyond individual client files to scrutinize the entire financial services value chain, particularly in instances of significant consumer harm.
The FAAA reiterated its concerns about ASIC's investigation process, drawing attention to the previous collapse of financial entities like Dixon Advisory. The association criticized ASIC for historical lapses in effectively probing potential misconduct, which they argue has allowed detrimental practices to perpetuate. The FAAA stresses that the focus must be broadened to include insights into product development, performance, and conflicts of interest within firms, to better safeguard consumers.
This call from the FAAA highlights notable deficiencies within ASIC’s current approach, insinuating that the regulatory body has been focused too narrowly on client advice files to detect systemic conflicts or unethical business models. As part of its utility oversight, ASIC’s actions-or in some cases, inactions-are central to public trust in Australia’s finance sector.
Transparency remains another focal issue, with the FAAA advocating for more public disclosure from ASIC concerning its investigations. Limited visibility leaves stakeholders-and particularly financial advisers-uncertain about regulatory outcomes, as reflected in reported dissatisfaction with ASIC's ability to act on concerns raised by the advisory sector.
This demand for a review of ASIC’s practices is significant because it implicates the efficacy of systemic financial governance in Australia. For consumers, this could mean either improved protection against financial misconduct or increased vulnerability if systemic deficiencies persist. Businesses, especially those offering financial advice, could face modified compliance landscapes and potentially larger oversight burdens.
Additionally, the call for broader investigations into the financial value chain may prompt firms to reevaluate their own oversight mechanisms. The issue more broadly underscores how transparency-both in terms of corporate activity and regulator responsiveness-is foundational for healthy market operations. Cumulatively, these reflections impact not only the individual firms but the confidence of the broader Australian financial atmosphere.
The FAAA's recommendations suggest a possible recalibration of ASIC’s strategic operations and reporting duties, potentially leading to stricter annual disclosure requirements about the status and outcome of investigations. Should these recommendations be acted upon, financial advisers may gain more protection against the unintended financial burdens of regulatory shortcomings.
Looking ahead, the outcome of these proposals rests significantly on how they are addressed by policy makers. Further developments could see consultative processes seek input from varied financial stakeholders, with refining policy changes aiming for a balanced approach that aligns regulatory responsibilities with industry realities. The evolving narrative around ASIC’s accountability and transparency will likely sustain interest and debate amongst both practitioners and regulatory observers in the financial services sector.
As discussions continue, the pursuit of a refined and more transparent investigation process presents an opportunity for strengthened trust in financial advisories and consumer protection frameworks, setting a promising precedent for future governance structures in Australian finance.
Published:Tuesday, 11th Mar 2025 Source: Paige Estritori
Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.
In a strategic move to bolster its customer support offerings, Isuzu Australia Limited (IAL) has announced the establishment of Isuzu Financial Services Australia (IFSA). This initiative marks the first time the Isuzu Group has founded a leasing company outside Japan, reflecting a significant commitment to the Australian market. - read more
Chinese automotive giant Geely Auto has announced its entry into the Australian light commercial vehicle market through its Farizon brand, specialising in electric commercial vehicles. This move signifies a notable expansion of electric vehicle (EV) offerings in Australia's commercial sector. - read more
The Clean Energy Finance Corporation (CEFC) has partnered with Volvo Group to introduce a $70 million financing package aimed at accelerating the adoption of heavy-duty battery electric trucks (HD BEVs) in Australia. This initiative seeks to address the substantial transport-related emissions by facilitating the transition to cleaner vehicle technologies. - read more
The Australian truck and van market has experienced a notable decline in 2025, with sales figures indicating an 11.8% decrease compared to the previous year. According to the Truck Industry Council (TIC), a total of 33,727 heavy vehicles were sold by the end of September, marking a significant drop from the 38,254 units sold during the same period in 2024. - read more
In a landmark move towards sustainable transportation, Scania has delivered its first battery electric truck to Total Logistics Solutions (TLS), a prominent Australian logistics provider. The Scania 25 P, a 10-pallet curtainsider equipped with a powered tailgate, is set to revolutionise urban deliveries by eliminating tailpipe emissions. - read more
The pursuit of a quality truck or fleet can be a significant undertaking for any business, especially within the dynamic and ever-expanding Australian transport industry. An understanding of the variety of financing options available within this sector is crucial, as it allows businesses to strategically acquire heavy vehicles that are vital to their operations. - read more
Running a successful trucking business in Australia can be a challenge, but with the right financing options, you can grow your business and increase profits. One popular financing option for truckers in Australia is leasing. Leasing allows trucking businesses to acquire vehicles and equipment necessary for their operations without incurring the high costs of outright purchase. - read more
Maintaining a healthy credit score is crucial for securing future financial opportunities. Whether you're looking to invest in new equipment, expand your fleet, or get better loan terms, your credit health plays a big role in these possibilities. - read more
Creating a safety-first culture in the trucking industry goes beyond merely following regulations. It means prioritizing the well-being of drivers, the integrity of the cargo, and the security of the fleet. In this context, a safety-first mindset influences daily operations, decision-making, and long-term strategies. It's about cultivating a work environment where safety is an integral part of every action and thought. - read more
When it comes to expanding a commercial fleet in Australia, the decision between purchasing new or used trucks can have a significant impact on your budget. With this article, we aim to delve into the critical considerations that fleet owners must make in juxtaposing the costs of new verses used trucks, meticulously unraveling the financial layers to guide you towards a choice that aligns with your company's fiscal strategy. - read more
Start Here
Get a free truck loan eligibility assessment and compare truck finance and leasing options
without accessing your credit file!!
Knowledgebase
Option: A financial derivative that gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell an asset at a specified price on or before a specified date.
